Li Er, in my early years, I was particularly philosophical and American. For me, its significance is not so much what it means, so it is more a detail. Two days ago, I wrote a life, and his IQ was very, very high, almost as high as Einstein’s. In modern life, Hollywood movie star Sharon Si Tong is also a symbol of her high IQ. Heidegger’s words have something in common. In fact, they are two people from all over the world. Their common feature is cleverness. For others, it is a kind of knowledge. For me, it is a kind of detail. Generally, people
Liang Hong is a new test for the family. The source of this novel means that the family must have enough rich knowledge to prepare. You can say that the fecal Bastille virus is fictional, but the details of the knowledge points are true. It requires the family to know at least and you have to understand their subtle similarities. At the same time, it forms some kind of irony than Sharon Si Tong Heidegger. This is a test of the family’s intelligence. I’m sure other families are amazed when they read it. How can Li Er know so much knowledge? I think the family is thin and lack of knowledge now.
Li er can also be said to be nonsense knowledge.
Encyclopedia narration
To tell the truth, Liang Hong was not interested in the classification of revolutionary personal knowledge at first as far as coloratura is concerned. What I pay most attention to is that its special narrative form reveals the starting point of new novel beauty and thinking. As early as a few years ago, critics recognized that Li Er introduced a narrative spirit of seeking truth from facts into the text and showed some professional evaluation criteria. However, I think he said half of it, which can be seen from coloratura. This narrative of seeking truth from facts shows a new style, various memoirs, newspapers and materials, historical facts, fictional narration and various knowledge to contemporary literature. This paper discusses that it is a very professional paper, especially a product of modern science and technology. This kind of intellectual and objective expression of various stylistic forms is mixed with mistakes. The narrative of the novel given is very complicated. This is a combination of knowledge and historical evidence. Calvino wrote in the memorandum of the next Millennium that modern novels are an encyclopedia, a method of seeking knowledge, especially a kind of things and people in the world. The etymology and meaning of encyclopedias here are not consistent. On the contrary, according to Calvino, they are still contradictory because of encyclopedic novels. Commitment is not to show the value of accurate knowledge, but to try to establish something in all kinds of knowledge. The meaning behind this is dynamic doubt, and it may be pure emptiness. As far as its structural elements are concerned, your novel can be said to show the narrative tendency of encyclopedia. What does it mean for the novel to be called encyclopedia in your opinion?
Li Er, I don’t think Calvino’s novel has been realized. I want to make a joke, but I have partially realized his other words. It is taken for granted that I didn’t write this novel because of Calvino. They were not stimulating reactions. Later, people saw the novel in the same way, and I also accepted this statement. According to my understanding, the concept of Calvino is a dialogue of all kinds of knowledge. What do you say? Actually, the realistic context in China is more complicated than that in the country when Calvino lived. This is much more complicated than that in that country. Context stimulates the narrator to do narrative, and it will present this kind of encyclopedic novel. Your novel will present all kinds of knowledge to form various corresponding conflict reactions, and then it will form this kind of novel.
Liang Hong, in fact, all kinds of knowledge fields are the most typical features of your novels, but knowledge is not a filling element in the novels to show the hero’s background or a certain atmosphere. It is a world of knowledge. Methodists are committed to building a complex display of all kinds of knowledge and things, and their association eventually forms a certain cognition of events and things, which has a direct impact on the formation of novel style. To read your novels, you don’t need professional knowledge in philosophy, beauty, history, etc., but you also need to have full intellectual thinking and dialogue skills. Otherwise, it is difficult for you to touch the core area of humor and irony.
Li Er’s novel is written by Calvino, and I think he will fantasize about it. Because his country has no such complicated experience, the modern history of China has been broken by external pressure from the late Qing Dynasty to the present in the process of modernization in China, and this kind of context will give birth to this novel. My novel came into being at the historic moment.
Liang Hong’s dialogic style can better reflect the pluralistic history in a certain sense, and the direction of pluralistic meaning is just in line with China’s complexity in reality, and it is difficult for China’s complex historical situation to reach the linear historical view, which is difficult to reach, and they are very contradictory.
Li er usually talks about writing such a novel full of dialogue, and we will write several characters with conflicting personalities and concepts. I can’t say the meaning of this novel is very convenient and easier to read and accept, but I prefer to choose another way to write it so that it can return to the scene, and this kind of shaping cultural characters with different personalities gives people the feeling of fiction.
People in Liang Hong all think that this novel is not as complicated as the market, and it is too difficult for all kinds of knowledge to meet, so it is accepted instead.
Li Er coloratura printed 30,000 copies in the first time, and now it has sold out about 70,000 copies. This circulation is already very large now, and it has not made much publicity. This kind of reading is true reading, but I don’t read it by hype. It says that people still need this novel to pursue the real impulse of history.
Liang Hong’s impulsive people won’t buy it precisely because this novel doesn’t give an accurate conclusion, but it stimulates people’s interest and thinking.
Li Er recently wrote a story about Lao She’s death. In my opinion, it is a story about how Lao She came from home. When talking about it, the parties were evasive, including his family who salvaged Lao She after jumping into the lake. Nowadays, many people say that they fished Mr. Lao She from the bottom of the lake and what clothes they wore after that. Wearing a gray coat and a suit means who closed Mr. Lao She’s eyes. Many people say that it is true and I don’t know who is telling it. No matter what purpose he brought, it is a tragedy. In the course of the story, we avoided the truth of history, and we can see that the world is very popular. The meaning of Lao She’s death has also been cancelled. He died in such a way that he told Vanity Fair people what to do, including those closest to him. It is also meaningless. It can be seen that such a knowledgeable person once wrote the story of Cat City, and how humble he died in our context, especially today, Lao She’s value has been fully affirmed. The situation is still very sad.
In many cases, Liang Hong’s coloratura narrative can better reflect the historical state, and others’ narrative can better present the history. The tragic real answer is getting farther and farther away. Actually, the exact etymological meaning here has changed. It does not mean to determine the answer to the world, but refers to a possibility of limited access. Behind it is a skepticism or relativism historical view. Various materials are verified and analyzed, and various knowledge fields are the most fully displayed. Various factors that affect the event are really variables and details are fragmented. The sound-forming dialogue dissolves each other or confirms the truth, which is not only revealed to the maximum extent in this constant verification, but also covered by limitations. Therefore, encyclopedic novels often present a complex and beautiful style, a combination of accuracy, complexity, simplicity and strangeness
The death of Li Er, Lao She, Fu Lei, Wang Guowei, and the death of every famous knowledge is a huge tragedy. The narrative may be a typical encyclopedic narrative.
Liang Hong’s knowledge has never been valued by contemporary literary works, and there are not many structuralists who can value their own knowledge. Usually, it is recognized that a family does not need such profound knowledge cultivation or such profound ideological resources.
Li er often does this. When they feel that they are going to finish writing, they will go deep into life and interview several events. They don’t see that this is usually accumulated. They think that deep into life is much more important than knowledge accumulation. When they come back from deep into life, they will bring one directly, which is the same as the viewpoint brought by the second deep into life. Our official institutions also encourage this.
Liang Hong, you deliberately described your identity in this way in the preface. I am the author of these quotations. By the way, you made necessary supplements to the absurdity that is too obvious. You specially emphasized your copied identity. You deliberately convinced the reader of its authenticity and objectivity. What kind of narrative view are you trying to achieve? We know that the avant-garde prose is looking for individuality at the starting point, but the individual is hidden in you. This is a very interesting phenomenon. Does this change mean that the personal experience, personal perception and experience perception mode are unreliable for writing? It can be completed through his narrative.
Li er, I don’t think so. When I emphasize copying identity, I want more personal voices to be presented. If I don’t emphasize this point, it is a writing or narrative voice. Nowadays, many narratives turn one voice into multiple voices.
Liang Hong Flaubert spent nearly ten years reading nearly 1,500 professional knowledge related to history, chemistry, medicine, geology and archaeology, and so on, and finished the draft of bouvard Peguechet. Finally, he told people through characters that his secret wish was to be a scribe again, which meant that Flaubert felt that he could complete his personal fictional narrative with the continuous entry of knowledge. Calvino questioned this. The problem is that we should explain the end of this unfinished novel. bouvard Peguechet gave up his desire to understand the world and was willing to return to be a ghostwriter. Dedicated to the hard work of handwritten drawings in Vientiane Library, should we draw a conclusion that bouvard Peijuxie’s experience table encyclopedia must be mixed? Flaubert’s relatives have changed themselves into a universal encyclopedia, which is absolutely no less than his pen’s passion. They want to master every kind of knowledge, and they are destined to be excluded from everything. Is he going to show his two talented people to explore knowledge for such a long time or to show that knowledge is purely illusory?
Li Er, every family tries to put the world in one place, or at first, he wants to put the world in his private library, and then collect all his knowledge from the private library into him. It is hard to say that it is illusory to put the knowledge of the world together into a night boat. He will find that a certain family’s viewpoint method will explain an idea, which will produce such a great attempt as Flaubert. This is an ambition.
Liang Hong’s connection here may be an important word in solving the novel form. The process of searching for Ge in the coloratura is a huge Foucault-style archaeological process of knowledge, which means that historical narrative has become a modern history. The purpose is not to verify, but to discover and discover the scene. Even the smallest elements that make up history are not complicated before. What kind of situation will it be when an event happens and the character field is restricted? When the story gradually blurs, the facts are constantly derived and the details drown everything in the novel. Instead, the plot is constantly derived, the accidental connection is constantly complicated, and it is like a big one. It is interlocking and getting bigger and bigger, and it is increasingly inseparable from each other. These textual research materials can be traced back to a certain phase of professional discussion, and they spread limitedly, occupying a larger and larger novel. This development seems to be to wrap a universe in it and finally find Ge into a limited delay that can not be completed. What different influences do you think will have on the solution of Ge in the dialogue between the three narrators?
Li Er, these three people are all a ha-ha mirror, presenting the image of Ge respectively. They all say that they are similar to Faulkner’s novels, but not the same. Everyone in Faulkner’s novels is talking to himself, but to someone who can kill him at any time. The last narrator of this novel is Fan Jihuai, who is not facing death threats because he tells about Bai Ling, who lures him into a certain historical situation, and he is not expressing his sincerity. From a modern history of China, when expressing his views, he takes on a certain performance nature, which is full of coloratura.
Liang Hong’s second part directly constitutes an intertextuality of narration and retelling, and reinterprets narration. Through your historical materials and various professional knowledge, it is said that oral history is something in a person’s memory, and you analyze and deconstruct his narration through such a true voice. When this person narrates, a dialogue is formed at the same time, and a big dialogue is formed in it, which is constantly entangled in the structure to achieve very complicated parts.
Li er, when I wrote this novel, I was worried that it would not be finished, because every sentence you found needed to be explained, and your quotation needed to be explained again. As this became history, you need to keep explaining it. This is a real fear.
Liang Hong’s various literary styles are constantly explained, forming a very complicated and complicated maze history, which will never be completed. You find that the maze history is close to the core of history, but you will never reach it. This is the narrative feeling. This dialogue narrative not only shows Ge’s narrative in the state, but also shows the historical requirements behind each narrator. It can be said that it is a correction to the ideological narrative in the historical field, and it is also a correction to the narrative of personal experience novels that are losing vitality.
Li er, everyone is avoiding something. Although the image of Ge is still relatively clear in the end, people will think that Ge is also a kind of restraint in telling them, and they will also be under some pressure when telling lies. These three personalities are not bad, and they also form some convenience for the image of Ge.
Liang Hong, everyone of them cherish him, everyone loves him, but everyone is hurting him. This just shows a certain paradox of knowledge division. Now you have to sacrifice your individuality to protect your friend’s heroism. You have to kill him. In what sense do you think such a multi-part structure can reveal the individual knowledge division in China’s revolutionary situation?
Li er, I think coloratura is the best way I can find, but when I try to write other subjects, I can’t do it again because I can’t repeat myself
Transcending the historical vision and historical view
Liang Hong also has an important problem. I think contemporary scholars lack a grand view of history or a vision beyond the historical horizon. Compared with reading Mo Yan’s language, he conceived some kind of spiritual publicity to an extreme, but behind it, it was thin. He wrote something that is historical common sense. Almost all the knowledge of contemporary people in China is not independent of the general vision. The historical view is just like the poison chapter in Master Kucherpetersburg. He looks beyond the general historical view and examines what you think a family historical view means to the family.
Li Er, I have noticed that some critics with left-wing tendencies think that his views are actually subjective and critical views, but Mo Yan still explains that the structure of his novels is a kind of self-explanation. Other people, animals, reincarnation, revolution and chapters have never been like this before. I think this is also Mo Yan’s view of history, which is of course very important to the family.
Liang Hong’s problem is that economists don’t realize this, which is an unconscious state. They don’t realize it at all, but they don’t realize it. They don’t think this is a problem. I’m an independent voice, which is different from the main ideological voice. That’s enough. It’s already a fact that everyone in the nation knows the history shell or it’s really a fatigue after reading it. A family should thoroughly question consciousness.
Li er should be like this
Liang Hong: When I was reading coloratura, I felt that there was a deep historical vision in it. Three people interpreted and digested an event, and then copied the historical statement. The truth became confusing. It forced me to read and keep looking for other references to say that historical narrative became a modern history. The purpose of archaeology was not to verify, but to discover that the discovery on the spot constituted historical elements. It can be said that this is a coloratura historical poem. A historian should question the only historical view, give readers a broader perspective, and let readers feel the truth behind it. However, it is also commented that this kind of multilingualism will lead to extreme relativism, and I don’t want to be blunt. There are three ways to tell the story of the protagonist Ge from three angles, which means that no matter how you say it, there is no truth. This is the historical truth. I don’t know what the meaning of this historical truth is. How do you interpret this criticism?
Li er’s words are Zhang Ning’s saying that Zhang Ning is my friend, but I think he misunderstood me. He thinks my novel is deconstruction, and I think coloratura is not relativism. It contains an attempt to construct, and I think this construction is meaningful. When I can’t help it, coloratura can actually be regarded as a idealism.
Liang Hong, I think that the historical view should be based on family, including the quality of criticism and ultimately maintaining a sense of vigilance. Compared with the land reform and the Cultural Revolution, which are important events in China’s contemporary history, we are all generally critical. Based on this, the critics have not tried to return to the historical scene. Perhaps this requires courage and some kind of secular moral trial in many cases. For example, as far as the current knowledge is concerned, it is much greater for people who recognize the Cultural Revolution to bear the pressure than those who recognize the mistakes after the Cultural Revolution. He may be spurned by a fellow nation.
Li Er, I’m quite sure that Gefei’s novel is a new understanding of that period of history, and now the main knowledge is divided into critical positions and different understandings. Now we deny this period of history, and recognize that 195196 is a history of the failure of the Republic, which is also recognized as a knowledge-divided common consciousness and a humanistic knowledge-divided independent judgment. He lacks a different view. That utopian attempt is questionable, but it is also a vibrant era. People have done many wrong things with very beautiful goals and pure wishes. People are willing to hurt their individuality and integrate into the flood, which finally brings personal tragedy. Tragedy novels have been written.
Liang Hong’s simple criticism is the most common fault of China’s knowledge division, which is either one or the other with binary opposition
Li er’s novel is just against this kind of either-or novel. It is necessary to find all kinds of possibilities to return to the scene. If the scene is full of possibilities, novelists should cherish these possibilities as much as details.